Justice and Objectivity as Balancing Principles
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Laws , Symmetry , and Symmetry Breaking ; Invariance , Conservation Principles , and Objectivity ∗
Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attention to the subject of symmetries and invariances, and they have largely neglected the subtopic of symmetry breaking. I illustrate how the topic of laws and symmetries brings into fruitful interaction technical issues in physics and mathematics with both methodological issues in philosophy of scie...
متن کاملNegotiating about charges and pleas – balancing interests and justice
There is a worldwide movement towards alternatives to judicial decision-making for legal disputes. In the domain of criminal sentencing, in Western countries more than 95% of cases are guilty pleas, with many being decided by negotiations over charges and pleas, rather than a decision being made after a judge or jury has heard all relevant evidence in a trial. Because decisions are being made, ...
متن کاملBalancing of Legal Principles and Constraint Satisfaction
Outline Outline Restatement Restatement of of the differences between the differences between legal rules and legal rules and legal legal principles principles Theory of coherence as constraint Theory of coherence as constraint satisfaction satisfaction applied to applied to legal reasoning legal reasoning (a (a glimpse glimpse)) Case study Case study
متن کاملPrinciples of justice in health care rationing.
This paper compares and contrasts three different substantive (as opposed to procedural) principles of justice for making health care priority-setting or "rationing" decisions: need principles, maximising principles and egalitarian principles. The principles are compared by tracing out their implications for a hypothetical rationing decision involving four identified patients. This decision has...
متن کاملJustice McHugh, Representative Government and the Elimination of Balancing
This article critically examines Justice McHugh’s use of the idea of representative government, an idea that has been crucial to the development of the implied freedom of political communication in the High Court. According to Justice McHugh, the Court ought to limit itself to what he calls the ‘constitutionally prescribed system of representative government’, a conception ostensibly grounded u...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2084-1264
DOI: 10.1515/wrlae-2015-0024